How AI hallucinations clash with data subject rights under the GDPR

AI Hallucinations and Data Subject Rights under the GDPR: Regulatory Perspectives and Industry Responses” – really insightful paper on the links between the GDPR and the way AI models work.

Worth the read (and do check out the links on page 4, not just the one to my op-ed on the issue – https://lnkd.in/eYXabSfs – but also to other opinion pieces that have been written on the topic)

Great to see an emphasis on the fact that “Models are not databases of information or structured repositories of facts or personal data. They do not operate by retrieving information from a database or by �copying and pasting� portions of existing data”.

With the European Data Protection Board due to adopt an Opinion on the issue of AI model training and data protection in the next 3 weeks, I hope takes a forward-looking view of what constitutes (processing of) personal data and that it sees that, as the author Theodore Christakis points out, data subject rights make the most sense at the level of the output.

Paper available on SSRN: https://lnkd.in/eFamvba9

🫖

Did this analysis get you thinking? Reach out!

DataLaws.net is entirely open-access, and instead of getting your data in exchange for this content, how about another trade? If this commentary saved you research time or sparked an idea, feel free to invite me over for tea, chai or a hot chocolate next time you are around Brussels or Antwerp - or invite me over to your offices for a chat!

Get in touch ↗   Let's connect on LinkedIn ↗