Can't find what you're looking for? Try the search bar or refine your parameters using the Frameworks & Concepts button above.
So, here’s the comparison between the EDPB’s new ePrivacy Guidelines and the version that was up for public consultation end of 2023. As you can see, not much has changed. The fundamental issues that affected the previous version (competence, overbroad interpretation that doesn’t match the actual meaning of words or the intention of the legislator, […]
Here’s the registration form for the EDPB’s stakeholder event on AI models: https://lnkd.in/enBa5dHq 500-character limit for an explanation of why your organisation should take part More on this in my in-depth article on AI models and GDPR: https://lnkd.in/eYXabSfs data protection privacy
Significant news from the ICO re Meta: lower price than EU, and no “less personalised ads” offering… in the UK. The “Pay or OK” type of approach is alive and well over there (in this case: for Facebook & Instagram). Compared to the EU approach, it looks like the UK regulator has taken a pragmatic stance […]
Simplification and the Draghi report in relation to EU digital laws: what could/should be done? Some thoughts I shared at an event yesterday on the topic: 1. The laws themselves are not always bad. While I have argued for getting rid of the ePrivacy Directive altogether (by taking into account overlaps with the GDPR and […]
Good to read about the EDPB promoting pseudonymisation in Seoul, but let’s be honest: their guidelines on the topic need serious updating further to the CJEU’s SRB judgment. Yes, they do say the opposite of SRB: 22. Pseudonymised data, which could be attributed to a natural person by the use of additional information, is to […]
Fun day! After moderating a RAID panel with as panelists EDPB Chair Anu Talus, Luxembourg CNPD President Tine A. Larsen, Deputy Head of Data Protection Unit at the Commission’s DG Justice Karolina Mojzesowicz, MEP Brando Benifei and Gibson Dunn Partner Ahmed Baladi, I then was a speaker in a debate alongside Max Schrems of noyb.eu, […]
The ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of yesterday, 4 September 2025, in the EDPS v SRB case is significant – never mind the naysayers. It is the first time that the CJUE has clearly, explicitly said that if a dataset initially contains personal data but is pseudonymised, and that […]
My takeaways from the 100+ comment discussion following my post on whether the Crowdstrike incident is a “personal data breach” under the GDPR: 1. There are clearly two camps on this. I didn’t expect this level of opposition between two visions of what is a personal data breach. 2. One camp adheres to the views […]
Does training of AI systems involve the processing of personal data, and is it permitted under the GDPR? These were the two fundamental questions that I have already looked into in two previous articles: On the date of that second article, the Cologne Higher Regional Court (the Oberlandesgericht Köln – the Cologne HRC) delivered a […]
Part 2 of critical review of the Commission’s PayorOK decision on Meta & the DMA: now for the more GDPR-related part, on consent. As mentioned in part 1 ( https://lnkd.in/dvNKkjWk ), the European Commission (EC) draws lots from the EDPB’s Consent or Pay Opinion. [I was *very* critical of that Opinion – see https://lnkd.in/eddQ4yW8 ] […]
