Scope: privacy

Can't find what you're looking for? Try the search bar!

How a new legislative amendment shifts the Belgian DPA toward a judicial approach

Belgian Data Protection Authority moving towards more judicial approach? In a newly adopted law, the Belgian legislator makes various changes to BDPA, notably requiring the President of the Litigation Chamber to be “a magistrate” and increasing the Litigation Chamber’s power to adopt interim decisions. For over 4 years now, Hielke Hijmans has been in charge […]

Read Analysis →

Let’s connect at the upcoming IAPP DPC24 conference in Brussels

Going to IAPP DPC24 in Brussels next week? Fancy having a chat? Reach out by direct message or by e-mail! I will be giving the adtech workshop on Tuesday 19 November (from 9 to 12.30 at Studios 214 & 216) and will be around the conference venue the remaining days – be sure to say […]

Read Analysis →

Register for our free webinar on personalized ads and consent frameworks

Register now for the free webinar of Friday 15 November (noon CET) on Personalised Advertising and “Consent or Pay” (critical perspectives on EDPB guidance and regulatory considerations). Moderated by Etienne Drouard (Hogan Lovells), my co-panellists include Townsend FEEHAN (IAB Europe), Daniela GOMEZ (Groupe TF1) and Dirk Freytag (BVDW). Registration link: https://lnkd.in/diwE3Ybj This is ahead of […]

Read Analysis →

A counter-perspective on why pay or data frameworks deserve a fair legal review

Probably a very unpopular view here! Companies have recently been getting a lot of flak for implementing or thinking about a “Pay or Data” approach – with only one perspective seemingly presented in data protection discussions on LinkedIn over the past months. So here are some (personal) thoughts aimed at showing there is another side […]

Read Analysis →

An unofficial translation and breakdown of the new Belgian DPA cookie checklist

The Belgian Data Protection Authority just published a “cookie checklist” with its position on a number of issues regarding cookies. I’m attaching an unofficial machine translation (losing lots of its layout too), but here are some first thoughts: – Some of these topics might be subject to litigation, so while they may reflect the newest […]

Read Analysis →

Speaking with Max Schrems on the future of user consent networks

1.000 registered – and counting. The “Future of User Consent” webinar of 24 Sept., where I am speaking alongside Max Schrems of noyb.eu, Romain Gauthier of Didomi and Willy Mikalef of Bird & Bird looks set to have a broad range of attendees. On the agenda are some of the top data protection, GDPR, ePrivacy […]

Read Analysis →

New contract necessity questions for corporate processing referred to the CJEU

In today’s EU Official Journal, new questions submitted to the CJEU: What is “necessary” for performance of a contract under the GDPR, and can customary business practices be taken into account in this assessment? In languages such as French where gender traditionally has an influence on many words in a sentence and also on how […]

Read Analysis →

Join my upcoming webinar with Max Schrems on the future of tracking consent

This should be fun! Didomi has invited me to share the floor with Max Schrems during a webinar on 24 Sept. on the Future of User Consent. I don’t always agree with Max or noyb.eu, whether in my personal conviction or through my professional work (in fact, I have/had a few litigation cases where we […]

Read Analysis →

Meta launches an annulment action against the EDPB consent or pay opinion

In today’s Official Journal: Meta’s annulment action against the EDPB’s Consent or Pay Opinion (Opinion 08/2024). Here are the pleas: “In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law. 1. First plea in law, alleging that either Article�64(2) GDPR is illegal and inapplicable pursuant to Article�277�TFEU, or it requires a restrictive […]

Read Analysis →

How the EDPB fast-tracks its urgent guidelines on commercial data models

Clearly the EDPB considers its “Consent or Pay” Opinion to cover “targeted questions requiring a swift answer”, as its minutes from the June plenary reveal that the EDPB members agreed that “Article 64(2) opinions are better suited for targeted questions requiring a swift answer, while guidelines are better suited for matters with a larger scope”. […]

Read Analysis →